ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Resection and linear repair of aneurysms of the left ventricle alter its geometry and thereby reduce its performance over the long term. Hence, Dor's circular patch repair was advocated to maintain the geometry of the left ventricle. However, the superiority of this procedure over linear repair is debatable. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed 95 cases of left ventricular aneurysm repair--28 cases by Dor's procedure and 67 by linear repair. The age group, symptoms, risk-factor profile and severity of coronary artery disease were comparable in both the groups, but the cardiopulmonary bypass and mean aortic cross-clamp time were longer in those treated with Dor's procedure. The left internal mammary artery could be grafted to the left anterior descending artery or diagonal branch in 13 cases in the group undergoing Dor's procedure (group I) versus 14 cases in the group undergoing linear repair (group II). There was no mortality in group I while there were 7 deaths in group II. Patients in group I were followed up for up to 2 years and those in group II for up to 13 years. During follow-up, 16/2 8 remained in NYHA functional class I or II in group I versus 24/67 in group II. The mean preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was 34.9% in group I which improved to 39.7% during follow-up. In group II, the mean preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was 37.2% which improved to 41.5% during follow-up. This difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In our retrospective study, we did not observe any superiority of Dor's repair over linear repair for left ventricular aneurysm as regards NYHA functional class and left ventricular ejection fraction. However, follow-up with Dor's repair was short (up to 2 years). Hence, no definite conclusions can be drawn.